NSW environment regulator issued one fine across 117 recorded breaches of deadly 1080 poison rules, government data reveals
More than half of all reported incidents involved a non-target animal death or injury. Not one resulted in a penalty.
Government data obtained under freedom of information laws reveals that the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) issued just one financial penalty across 117 recorded breaches of the state's 1080 poison regulations over nearly five years — a penalty rate of less than one per cent.
The data, released by the NSW EPA in response to a Government Information (Public Access) (GIPA) request lodged by the Coalition Against 1080 Poison, documents enforcement outcomes for all reported breaches of the Pesticide Control (1080 Bait Products) Order 2020 between January 2020 and October 2024. Of the 117 recorded cases, 93 resulted in no action whatsoever. Twenty-six received only an advisory letter. Four received a formal warning. Two received an official caution. One was fined.
Sixty-seven of the 117 cases — 57 per cent — involved the confirmed death or injury of a non-target animal. Not one of those cases resulted in a penalty notice.
Sodium fluoroacetate — known as 1080 — is a Schedule 7 Dangerous Poison used across rural and peri-urban NSW to kill foxes, feral pigs, rabbits, and what authorities classify as wild dogs. Its use is governed by a detailed regulatory order that mandates neighbour notification, public warning signage, minimum buffer distances from residences and water sources, mandatory record-keeping, and strict bait density limits. Breaches carry maximum penalties of $60,000 for individuals and $120,000 for corporations under the Pesticides Act 1999.
The GIPA data shows the maximum penalty has effectively never been applied. The single fine on record represents a financial deterrent of near-zero for operators who breach notification and signage rules — the two failures most directly linked to the poisoning of domestic dogs.
Enforcement outcomes:
117 cases. One penalty.
| # | Local Government Area | Breaches | Penalty Notices |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Central Coast | 8 | 0 |
| 2 | Inverell Shire | 6 | 0 |
| 3 | Armidale Regional | 5 | 0 |
| 4 | Bega Valley | 5 | 0 |
| 5 | Clarence Valley | 5 | 0 |
| 6 | Walcha | 5 | 0 |
| 7 | Upper Lachlan Shire | 5 | 0 |
| 8 | Glen Innes Severn | 4 | 0 |
| 9 | Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional | 4 | 0 |
| 10 | Port Macquarie-Hastings | 3 | 0 |
| 11 | Coffs Harbour | 3 | 0 |
| 12 | Lithgow City | 3 | 0 |
The geographic spread of breaches underscores the scale of the problem. Central Coast recorded the highest number of breaches in the state at eight — a peri-urban zone where residential properties directly border baiting areas. Not one of those eight cases resulted in a penalty notice. Inverell Shire recorded six; Armidale Regional, Bega Valley, Clarence Valley, Walcha, and Upper Lachlan Shire each recorded five. Across the twelve highest-breach local government areas in the state, the penalty notice count is zero.
The Coalition Against 1080 Poison has published the full EPA1058A dataset at ban1080.org.au/demand-epa-accountability. Information access requests replicating the GIPA framework have also been lodged with the equivalent regulatory agencies in Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania, the ACT, and the Northern Territory.
The EPA announced in late 2025 a proposed organisational restructure involving the net reduction of 75 staff roles — approximately eight per cent of its ongoing workforce — citing budget sustainability. The Coalition has raised concerns that reductions to regional compliance capacity will further diminish the agency's ability to investigate time-sensitive pesticide breaches.
Structural failures in
the EPA's oversight capacity
A follow-up GIPA request revealed further structural failures in the agency's oversight capacity. Of 14 detailed questions posed to the EPA about its 1080 enforcement systems, seven returned the response: 'no records held'.
The EPA disclosed it has no records describing the number of formal investigations ever initiated into 1080 breaches.
EPA response: no records heldNo records held describing how record-keeping is audited or what enforcement actions have followed from those audits.
EPA response: no records heldThe EPA has conducted no proactive compliance monitoring programs targeting 1080 baiting operations.
EPA response: no records heldThe EPA has never audited Authorised Control Officers — the government employees responsible for supplying the poison — and holds no enforcement records relating to them.
EPA response: no records heldThe EPA cannot provide a regional or annual breakdown of its own enforcement activity.
EPA response: no records heldThe EPA holds no records defining key enforcement terms and cannot articulate the known limitations and gaps in its own data.
EPA response: no records heldThe evidence is in the regulator's own records. Add your name to the growing number of Australians demanding the NSW EPA enforce the rules that exist to protect communities and wildlife from 1080 poison.
Demand EPA Accountability →Notes to Editors
-
Note 1
Source: EPA1058A — a spreadsheet released by the NSW EPA under GIPA reference EPA1058, produced by the Chemicals Regulation Group. It covers 1 January 2020 to 31 October 2024 and is accepted by the Coalition as the EPA's own authoritative record. The full document is published at ban1080.org.au.
-
Note 2
Enforcement action categories as recorded in EPA1058A: Resolved through education or guidance (16); Advisory letter (26); Formal Warning (4); Official Caution (2); Penalty Notice (1); Clean up Notice (0); No recorded action (93). Some cases received multiple actions; the totals therefore exceed 117.
-
Note 3
The 12 highest-breach LGAs: Central Coast (8), Inverell Shire (6), Armidale Regional (5), Bega Valley (5), Clarence Valley (5), Walcha (5), Upper Lachlan Shire (5), Glen Innes Severn (4), Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional (4), Port Macquarie-Hastings (3), Coffs Harbour (3), Lithgow City (3). Zero penalty notices across all 12.
-
Note 4
Follow-up GIPA request reference EPA1118 (lodged May 2025, 14 questions). Questions returning 'no records held': number of formal investigations initiated (Q2, partial); record-keeping audit methods and enforcement actions (Q8); proactive compliance monitoring programs (Q9); ACO audits and enforcement (Q10); regional/annual data breakdowns (Q11); key term definitions (Q13); known data gaps and limitations (Q14).
The Coalition Against 1080 Poison is an advocacy organisation dedicated to exposing the regulatory, environmental, and animal welfare failures of sodium monofluoroacetate ('1080 poison') use in Australia. The Coalition campaigns for a legislative ban on 1080 and uses evidence-based research, freedom of information, and community mobilisation to hold regulators and governments accountable.
ban1080.org.auHigh-resolution assets, full EPA1058A dataset, and GIPA correspondence available here.